đ Princess saving app, Types of luck, Unified theory of deliciousness, Congestion tax, Consensus of the Conclave
Happiest country, Unparalleled misalignments, Ancient glacial caves and more
Hello, this is post #212.
Curating this piece from my favorite reading nook in our new home; it feels surreal. When we first visited this place four years ago, this very corner took our breath away. It played a big part in our decision to make this space our own. And now, itâs finally real.
This week was full of action: moving day on Tuesday, setup on Wednesday, and then some deep thinking and debates at the office offsite on Friday and Saturday. Somewhere in the chaos, I managed to steal a few quiet moments to read and refuel my mind and heart.
Iâm glad I did. Todayâs picks are the fruit of those stolen moments. Right now, I feel content. Life is beautiful.
Take a look at what Iâve got for you today:
And with that, letâs get to the main features.
đŽ Building a Princess Saving App
Daniel Cook breaks down Super Mario (and a few other classics) to show how games build learning and fun into the experience. I especially liked his idea of âexploratory learningâ. Hereâs a snapshot from the slide that explains it:
Games are such fascinating products. I always love deep dives that help us understand them and the "theory of fun" better. If you havenât already, check out Anna Anthropyâs âTo the right, hold on tight.â itâs my most recommended read on this topic!
đ¤ 4 Types of Luck
Tom Orbachâs Marketing Ideas is one of my favorite newsletters on marketing and growth. Each post is built around a sharp insight, brought to life with loads of real-world examples. Iâve had many aha moments reading his work.
In a recent post, Tom shares how he created his luck to win a $10,000 prizeâa fun story, even if he admits those tricks wouldnât work today.
Hereâs a quick snippet that offers a fresh way to think about luck.
For the other three, Tom shares his simple formula: Luck = Doing Ă Telling.
You get the idea. As always, his storytelling brings it to life in a fun, memorable wayâdefinitely worth a read.
đ Unified Theory of Deliciousness
Chef David Changâs âUnified Theory of Deliciousnessâ breaks down his secret code for creating unforgettable flavors. As the founder of Momofuku and the force behind 13 globally renowned restaurants, heâs someone worth listening to.
What really struck me was one simple truthânot about fancy culinary tricks, but the heart of what makes good food good. The magic ingredient, if you will.
To me this is what separates the good dishes from the truly slap-yourself-on-the-forehead ones. When you eat something amazing, you donât just respond to the dish in front of you; you are almost always transported back to another moment in your life. Itâs like that scene in Ratatouille when the critic eats a fancy version of the titular dish and gets whisked back to the elemental version of his childhood. The easiest way to accomplish this is just to cook something that people have eaten a million times. But itâs much more powerful to evoke those taste memories while cooking something that seems unfamiliarâto hold those base patterns constant while completely changing the context.
đĄ The Fewer the Merrier
Samuel Hughes lays out the case for unified land ownership in his Works in Progress piece, The fewer the merrier. He explores a development model where private landownersâoften painted as profit-hungryâend up creating more public goods than traditional economics would predict. That twist alone makes the piece worth reading.
Having lived in large residential societies, Iâve seen how shared amenities can shape community life. Itâs a privilege, no doubtâbut Hughes shows how thoughtful design could bring similar benefits to people across income levels. A thought-provoking read.
Where there is unified ownership, developing landowners have incentives to provide public goods. They lay out generous interconnected street networks; they provide parks, gardens and street trees; they curate the facades and front garden of each building to ensure it presents a gracious aspect onto its neighbors; they devote land to shopping crescents that produce relatively little revenue, and to churches and community buildings that produce none at all. None of these things happen when neighborhoods are developed under fragmented ownership, unless the public authorities intervene to ensure that they do.
This is the third week in a row Iâm featuring something from the Works in Progress newsletter. Iâm always blown away by the range and originality of their topics. Each piece dives deep but stays fun to read. If you enjoy being surprised every other week, this is one newsletter you should definitely subscribe to.
đŁď¸ Congestion Tax
A couple of years ago, the state government proposed a congestion tax on nine of the most traffic-heavy routes in Bangalore. The reaction? Widespread outrage. Most people mocked the ideaâwhy penalize those already stuck in traffic? And for many, these routes werenât a choice, but the only way to get to work or home. I had a similar reaction. I didnât fully understand the concept back then. Iâm not sure where that proposal stands nowâprobably gathering dust in some forgotten file.
Meanwhile, New York City went ahead with a similar plan, and the results have been fascinating. From what Iâve read, it seems to be working wellâno major fallout, and some positive shifts.
This New York Times report card offers a solid overview. It breaks down how congestion pricing affects transportation, public services, and local businesses. A great 101 if youâre curious about how such policies actually play out.
đŽ Casual Explorations
A handful of short reads I stumbled upon and enjoyed â a nice little palate cleanser.
1. Consensus of the Conclave â John O. McGinnis takes us through the history and function of the rules that govern the Conclave that selects the Pope. Itâs a quick read packed with fun trivia and core insights into human behavior.
Soon afterwards, Gregory X made cutting rations part of the formal rules governing the conclave. If, after three days, the conclave had not selected a Pope, the cardinals would face an enforced diet. Though medieval in origin, the ration-cutting rule squarely tackles a real weakness of supermajority voting spotted by modern theorists: spiraling decision costs.
2. My miserable week in the âHappiest Country on Earth.â Molly Young attempts to understand âhappinessâ. A travelog, an essay, a beautiful collection of observations and beautiful wordplays.
All of this was enchanting, but it was a piece of signage that took my breath away. At home in Brooklyn, the library is papered with reminders to âPlease keep your voice down.â In contradistinction, the signs at Oodi said, âPlease let others work in peace!â The two commands are almost â but meaningfully not â synonymous. The Brooklyn version is a plea for self-control. The Finnish version is a request to acknowledge the existence of other people. You see the difference.
⨠Everything else
Shaan Puriâs â5 Tweet Tuesdayâ delivers five tweet-sized gems every week. His curation is sharp, and the commentary nails it. Hereâs a recent one to give you a taste.
Ryan Newburn captures the raw, ancient beauty of Icelandâs glacial cavesâhis photos are absolutely stunning. Nature at its most surreal. His Instagram feed is a visual treat, with every shot telling a story you canât look away from.
Deer country // Stagnation, Mailman // Reply Guy, Frequent Flyer // Daily Mail. These are all Unparalleled misalignments. Lot more in the link. People can chase and collect anything.
ICYMIâŚ
Hereâs a quick link to last weekâs post:
That's all for this week, folks!
I hope I've earned the privilege of your time.
If this piece sparked something for you, Iâd love to hear what stood outâleave a comment and letâs keep the conversation alive. And if you know someone whoâs always asking "why?" or "how come?", pass this along to them. The world gets more interesting every time a curious mind shares what theyâve found.







Great piece as always Pritesh. Will go through the entire piece once again, fursat mein, during the day today. What caught my attention was congestion tax. Maybe itâs also in how it gets communicated and whether or not the city provides viable alternates. Maybe Bangalore failed on both counts?