đ Beatles Principle, Next Great Distribution Shift, Three Type of Specialist, Unhappy Meals
âSafe for Kidsâ Chat, Square Theory, Creative Neighbourhood in Mumbai & much moreâŚ
Hello, this is post #216.
One of my biggest pain points while driving in Bangalore is the congestion caused by mid-block U-turns on most major roads. Each one adds 5+ minutes to my journey, every single time.
A quick search pulled up enough academic research showing the many drawbacks of this design. You will relate to these instantly -
Vehicles slowing down to take the U-turn, others accelerating out of it, and through traffic trying to maintain speed â all of this creates dangerous weaving sections.
Thereâs often sudden braking before the U-turn and fast acceleration after. This leads to more rear-end crashes.
Vehicles rejoining traffic after a U-turn create fresh bottlenecks and delays further down the road.
U-turns collapse under pressure. Queues back up quickly, often spilling onto the main carriageway and blocking through lanes.
There is so much evidence available around the limitations of this design, still we have them everywhere. In fact, more roads seem to be getting fresh ones. What am I missing? If youâve any reference, do point me to it.
But, you didnât come here to hear me rant about Bangalore traffic. Youâre here for something exciting and insightful; and Iâve got plenty of that in todayâs post. Hereâs a quick glimpse:
Weâve a lot to cover today, letâs get started.
đĄ Beatles Principle, Design Tenet and lots of Design Wisdom with Bob Baxley
Bob Baxley has over 35 years of experience designing products at Apple, Pinterest, Yahoo, and ThoughtSpot. His conversation with Lenny is my podcast pick for the week.
Itâs packed with counterintuitive takes like:
Design should report to engineering, not product
The best products come from teams of 4 to 6, not 40 to 60 (what he calls the âBeatles principleâ)
Design principles, in most cases, arenât actually useful
Delay drawing or prototyping as long as possible
Each of these is ready to spark debate â and thatâs the point. Design has always been about a strong, opinionated point of view.
What makes Baxleyâs take worth listening to is how each idea comes with a story, a pattern, or a lived example.
Especially the bit on design principles â and why his idea of âdesign tenetsâ works better. That story alone makes this episode worth the listen.
đ¤ The Next Great Distribution Shift with Brian Belfour
The last couple of years building consumer products have taught me a few important lessons. Here are two that stand out:
Care about what your user cares about â and what theyâre willing to pay for. Everything else needs heavy storytelling, education, or brand-building just to make a dent.
Distribution is everything. This is where most good products lose the game.
Growing a fledgling game was a real challenge. Most distribution channels were crowded and expensive. Reaching the right users cost a bomb. And with how quickly tech and ecosystems change, Iâve seen channels lose their edge in a matter of months. What worked last quarter stops working this one.
Iâve also come to believe this: Whenever a major new platform emerges, it unlocks new product ideas â and gives them a shot at real reach, impact, and business.
Brian Belfourâs The Next Great Distribution Shift frames this really well. A couple of standout ideas from the piece:
What defines a true platform shift?
What separates a major platform shift from a minor one isn't the technology itself. It's whether that shift enables both new ways of building things AND new ways of reaching people.
How platform shifts always play out:
Every major new platform follows the same playbook: They start open and generous, practically begging developers to build on their platform. They need you to help solidify their moat. But once that moat has escape velocity? The walls go up. The taxes increase. The rules change. What was once free becomes paid. What was once permitted becomes forbidden.
Some platforms are surgical about itâGoogle took years to tighten its grip. Others are brutalâFacebook famously left "a trail of dead apps and battered businesses" when it shut down viral channels overnight. But they all follow the pattern.
ChatGPT could be the next big shift. Itâll be interesting to see how these patterns play out â and more importantly, which companies manage to stay relevant even after the platform becomes closed.
đŹ The Untold History of Designing âSafe for Kidsâ Chat
Last year, we wanted to boost player interaction in our game. Multiplayer mobile games get a lot more fun when real human interaction brings in some banter and a sense of connection.
We looked at our options. Voice chat was the obvious one â but we quickly ruled it out. Creating a safe, welcoming environment for all players felt too challenging with voice.
We landed on emoji and stickers â expressive, but within a controlled range. They felt safer, easier to moderate, and less prone to abuse. We also had to consider the risk of collusion â players teaming up unfairly â and that shaped a lot of our thinking.
Did it work? Well, it definitely drove engagement. But what we didnât expect were the new usage patterns that emerged.
Players started bombarding others with emoji and stickers â not to connect, but to distract them during their turn.
Some even began using a specific emoji as a signal â a kind of unofficial code for âletâs play it friendly.â We couldnât find hard evidence of collusion, but the pattern was clearly there. It started to feel like the in-game version of âASLâ in old chat rooms.
Reading The Untold History of Toontownâs SpeedChat took me right back to those days.
Disneyâs team was trying to build a chat system for kids â one that was safe, limited, and trustworthy. And it wasnât easy. Their design challenges, player behavior patterns, and trade-offs were all eerily familiar.
Itâs a fun and insightful read. And a good reminder: Human behavior will find a way. Better to anticipate it â or design with those patterns in mind â than be caught off guard every time.
3ď¸âŁ Three Type of Specialist
According to Kurt Vonnegut, three types of specialists are needed for the success of any revolution.
Someone capable of having original ideas; the kind that arenât already in circulation. An authentic genius.
A highly intelligent, well-respected citizen who understands and endorses those ideas; and can vouch that the genius isnât crazy.
A communicator; someone who can explain even the most complex ideas in a way that makes sense to almost anyone, no matter how resistant or uninformed.
Vonnegutâs key insight: none of these people can make a real dent on their own. But put them together â and they can create movements that shift the world.
Itâs a short piece, but it packs a punch.
đ Unhappy Meals with Michael Pollan
Eat food. Not too much. Mostly plants.
Thatâs how Michael Pollan sums up his advice on what humans should eat to stay healthy. These are the opening lines of his 2007 classic, Unhappy Meals (Archived version here).
Since then, weâve seen countless health food trends rise and fall â faster than the release cycle of new AI models.
Thatâs exactly what makes this essay stand out. It goes back to basics.
And Pollan doesnât hold back. Sample this:
âIf youâre concerned about your health, you should probably avoid food products that make health claims. Why? Because a health claim on a food product is a good indication that itâs not really food â and food is what you want to eat.â
Or this:
âHumans deciding what to eat without expert help â something theyâve done with notable success since coming down out of the trees â is seriously unprofitable if youâre a food company, distinctly risky if youâre a nutritionist, and just plain boring if youâre a journalist. (Or, for that matter, an eater. Who wants to hear, yet again, âEat more fruits and vegetablesâ?)â
He goes on to unpack the confusion around nutrition science and the idea of nutritionism â and thatâs where the piece gets dense. But also where it gets interesting. Because at the heart of it, Pollan is saying: we really donât know whatâs going on. And thatâs worth paying attention to.
Iâm no expert, but his perspective is worth knowing.
And if youâre looking for a little more than âEat food. Not too much. Mostly plants,â â he offers 8â9 solid tips based on everything heâs uncovered.
Just donât expect anything trendy. Thatâs the point.
And since weâre on the topic of food trends â hereâs another piece I found both informative and relevant. Karthik S dives into vegetarian substitutes for non-veg food. This is an area I had only a surface-level understanding of. Glad to now be a little more aware.
âšď¸ Square Theory
In #212, we had covered Unparalleled misalignments. Examples like:
Deer country // Stagnation
Mailman // Reply Guy
Frequent Flyer // Daily Mail
These are pairs of phrases where each word in one is a synonym of each word in the other â but the phrases themselves mean wildly different things. Instant click for anyone who enjoys language oddities.
If that was your kind of nerdy, hereâs a follow-up that goes even deeper. Adam Aaronson calls it the Square Theory. Itâs sort of like the same idea, but with more layers and more chaos.
Iâm sharing just a screenshot from his post for a glimpse. It only gets more insane from there. Click at your own risk.
đ Inky Memo & Quotes about Writing
And to lighten the mood â and maybe bring a little inspiration back â hereâs a collection of 51 Famous Quotes About Notebooks, Journaling and Writing, curated by one of my favorite newsletters for stationery lovers: Inky Memo.
A couple of my favourite ones:
âOn many of the jobs Iâve held, even if someone did not know my name or position, I was commonly referred to as âthat guy with the notebookâ. I was constantly taking notes. It is also a nice âpropâ if you want to appear âbusyâ. A thoughtful look, a slight chin rub, and a few notes. Working hard.â â Michael A. LaPlante (Writer)
âI write because I donât know what I think until I read what I say.â â Flannery OâConnor (Novelist)
⨠Everything else
For those excited about how art & creative expression helps us create stronger bonds with our roots, hereâs a story from Mumbai. Check this out to know how new creative neighbourhoods in Mumbai are preserving cultural heritage, while trying to avoid gentrification.
Ruthieâs Table 4 is a fascinating podcast. Ruthie Rogers, co-founder and chef at The River Cafe in London, talks food and life with people whoâve spent a lifetime chasing creative pursuits. The episode with Jony Ive stood out for me. Thoughtful, personal, and full of quiet insight. Hereâs a story that Jony shared about his Dad that stayed with me.
Well, he trained as a silversmith and a cabinet maker and then became a teacher and a professor. His specialism was art and design. And my Christmas present would be he would say, we will go into the workshops during during Christmas, which I'm sure was illegal, and we would go in for one day and he said, you know, we will make together whatever whatever you want with the one condition that you design it, and to me, he didn't actually say designed, what would have been I think I started doing that when I was probably about seven or eight, so very But what was curious. He didn't say design it, He said think about it and explain it to me, probably with a drawing. And what a wonderful definition of. Design explained by a drawing.
Aled Thompson illustrates birds and other animals in a style thatâs geometric, almost vector-like â and yet full of beauty and detail. His Instagram feed is a treat.
That's all for this week, folks!
ICYMIâŚ
Last week, we dived into the business behind the IPL, the art of spotting talent, and the stories shaping Indiaâs creative food sceneâall in one packed edition! From Michael Ovitzâs secrets on building lasting legacies to a marathon podcast on how IPL became a global powerhouse, this post is full of sharp insights, fun trivia, and fresh recommendations.
I hope I've earned the privilege of your time.
If this piece sparked something for you, Iâd love to hear what stood outâleave a comment and letâs keep the conversation alive. And if you know someone whoâs always asking "why?" or "how come?", pass this along to them. The world gets more interesting every time a curious mind shares what theyâve found.






This weekâs is a gold mine of a newsletter Pritesh. As a fellow-victim of the traffic and infra chaos in Bengaluru, if I might add a couple more things on the part of road users⌠the lack of common sense and a total lack of empathy (read design thinking). Design thinking not from a design perspective but just figuring how our actions may cause chaos and confusion on the roads.